Related reading

Luke Row is a BACP registered psychodynamic therapist (#197852) in Croydon, South London, currently undertaking advanced training at Tavistock Relationships. He works with individuals who've tried to reason their way through things and couples tired of managing each other, people ready to understand what's underneath. Book a session

Defences & Patterns
You want connection more than almost anything. And every time you get close to having it, you find a way to destroy it.

Defences & Patterns
Someone asks how you feel about something that just happened - a breakup, a job loss, your father's cancer diagnosis - and you go blank.

Defences & Patterns
You know all the words now. Gaslighting. Narcissist. Triggered. Boundaries. And somehow your relationships still aren't working.

Photo by Berke Citak on Unsplash
If you ask ChatGPT a vague question, you get a vague answer back. So you try again. You add some context, you explain what you actually meant. Maybe you tell it that the answer was technically correct, but somehow irritating. And suddenly it's much better. That makes sense to us.
Your input changed the output.
People who three years ago had never heard the word prompt now know that the quality of what you put into an AI affects what comes back. If the answer's odd or repetitive or completely misses the point, you might take a quick look at what you asked before deciding the whole system's useless.
We are much less curious about this when it's a person responding to us. Looking at your own part in an argument can feel like letting the other person off. Especially when you're still hurt by what they said.
Someone gets defensive and we decide that's just them, they're defensive. Someone withdraws, we decide they're avoidant. Someone snaps, we decide they've got an anger problem. Sometimes that is exactly the case. But there was also a moment before the reaction, and that's where it gets more interesting.
Human beings don't communicate in clean little text boxes. The words are only part of it. There's the pause before you answer, the look on your face, the fact that you asked, "Are you going out again tonight?" rather than, "Are you going out tonight?"
There's also what you expect is going to happen.
If you expect to be dismissed, you rarely approach as if that's merely a possible outcome. You arrive prepared for it. Your body is braced. Your question arrives with the defence built in: "I know you're probably going to think this is a bit ridiculous, but…" or you go the other way: "Fine, forget it."
The conversation has already started. And the other person is responding not just to what you want, but to everything that you've wrapped around it.
Imagine you've been feeling disconnected from your partner. You want them to reassure you, you want to know that something hasn't shifted, that you still matter. That's a frightening thing to want from another human. So instead of saying that, you say, "You don't seem very interested in spending time with me lately." Your partner hears that as criticism. They're tired. Work's been awful. They thought things were fine. Now they feel accused of failing. So they defend themselves: "What are you talking about? We just spent all weekend together."
Now you feel ridiculous. You weren't asking for an audit of the time you've been in the same room. You wanted reassurance… but that isn't what you asked for. So you get angrier. "This is exactly what I mean. You always do this."
They pull back. You pursue. They pull back further.
By the end of the argument, one person has proof their partner doesn't care, and the other has proof that nothing they do is ever enough. Both feel as though they were simply responding to the other. Neither notices that their response became the next prompt. And so round it goes.
Sometimes we become remarkably good at getting exactly the response we were afraid of. Not on purpose. That would almost be easier. It's more that we expect people to leave, so we become alert to signs they might. A delayed text feels different. A distracted expression gets noticed. A request for space feels ominous. You don't say, "I'm frightened you're pulling away." Maybe you ask if something's wrong six times. Maybe you go cold before they can. The other person feels watched, mistrusted, crowded. Eventually, they need distance. And there it is: the distance you knew was coming. Proof.
Or maybe you expect people to control you. Requests feel like demands. Concern feels intrusive. Someone asking what time you'll be home already sounds, somehow, like surveillance. So you get prickly. They become more careful. You experience their carefulness as a sort of tension. They start explaining themselves because everything seems to land badly. Now they really do sound controlling. Again, proof.
This isn't magic. You haven't manifested your childhood; you've just entered an interaction carrying an expectation, and that expectation has affected your behaviour. Their response to that behaviour affects what you do next. Eventually, both people are living inside a pattern that neither consciously chose.
Sometimes people really are just like that. You can communicate beautifully and still be lied to. You can be vulnerable with someone who uses vulnerability against you. There is no perfect prompt that guarantees the response you want. People have agency, histories, moods, defences, prejudices, desires, and limits of their own. They're not waiting for a sufficiently precise instruction. Thank God.
And if the same peculiar pattern keeps showing up across different relationships and contexts, then it's worth getting curious about how you show up in those moments: what role you've been pulled into and how you might help keep it going.
These patterns can turn up with a therapist too. You might find yourself going quiet after something they say feels critical. That silence can become part of the conversation, along with what they said and how they said it. There is a chance to notice the pattern while both of you are still inside it.