I’m on Easter break from 30 March – 13 April. I’ll respond to enquiries when I return.
I’m on Easter break from 30 March – 13 April. I’ll respond to enquiries when I return.
Related reading

Luke Row is a BACP registered psychodynamic therapist in Croydon, South London, with advanced training at Tavistock Relationships. He works with individuals who've tried managing their symptoms and couples tired of managing each other, people ready to understand what's underneath. Book a session →
I write like this once a month. No advice, no wellness tips. Just the stuff underneath.

Therapeutic Process
The therapy profession is roughly 80% female. So what does it mean that a man chose this work? More than you might think.

Therapeutic Process
You might notice things look a little different around here. The new logo on my website is subtle. Just the words "Talk to Luke" and a simple square....

Therapeutic Process
Your GP mentioned "talking therapies" and handed you a leaflet. The NHS website has reassuring language about "evidence-based psychological therapies....

You're not asking this question casually. Nobody googles "is couples therapy worth it" out of idle curiosity. You're asking because something between you has shifted and you can't shift it back. Because the arguments have a quality now that they didn't used to have. Because you're lying next to someone you chose and wondering when choosing stopped feeling like enough.
So let me try to answer honestly, which means the answer isn't simple.
Most people arrive at couples therapy with an image of what it's going to be. You'll sit on a sofa, explain your side, the therapist will explain to your partner why you're right, and then they'll give you some communication exercises to practise at home. Maybe a worksheet. Maybe a rule about using "I feel" statements instead of "you always" statements.
That's not what I do. And honestly, if that's what couples therapy was, I'm not sure it would be worth the money either.
The techniques-based version of couples work assumes the problem is that you're communicating badly. Learn to communicate better, problem solved. But most couples I see aren't struggling because they lack communication skills. They're struggling because what's actually happening between them is something neither of them fully understands. The communication breakdown is a symptom, not the cause.
You don't need someone to teach you how to fight more politely. You need someone to help you understand why these particular fights keep happening, why they escalate the way they do, why the same wound keeps getting reopened no matter how carefully you try to avoid it.
Here's what most couples don't realise when they walk in: you're not just two individuals with a disagreement. You're two people whose entire histories are colliding in ways neither of you chose or fully controls.
The way you react when your partner withdraws isn't just about them withdrawing. It's about every time someone important went quiet and you were left trying to work out what you'd done wrong. The way they shut down when you raise your voice isn't just about your voice. It's about what raised voices meant in the house they grew up in.
You've each brought an entire unconscious world into this relationship. And those worlds are interacting constantly, beneath the surface of whatever you're arguing about on any given Tuesday evening. The argument about the dishes isn't about the dishes. It never was. But neither of you can see what it's actually about because you're too busy being hurt and defensive and right.
Psychodynamic couples therapy is about making that unconscious interaction visible. Not so you can blame your childhoods for your problems, but so you can stop being blindsided by reactions that seem disproportionate to the situation. So you can start to see the difference between what's happening now and what it reminds you of.
When couples therapy works, it doesn't look like what you'd expect. It's not a dramatic breakthrough where everything suddenly makes sense. It's quieter than that.
It looks like one person saying something they've been afraid to say for years and the other person hearing it without immediately defending themselves. It looks like recognising, for the first time, that your partner's most irritating behaviour is actually their way of managing a fear you never knew they had. It looks like understanding that the thing you've been fighting about for a decade was never really the thing at all.
It looks like two people who had stopped being curious about each other becoming curious again. Not because someone taught them a technique, but because they finally understood enough about what was happening between them to see each other clearly.
The couples who do well in therapy aren't the ones who love each other the most or fight the least. They're the ones who can tolerate not knowing. Who can sit with the discomfort of seeing themselves clearly without running from it. Who are willing to discover that they might be part of the problem, even when they arrived certain the problem was entirely the other person.
A hundred pounds a session. Weekly. For months, probably. That's real money.
You're not paying for advice. I'm not going to tell you what to do about your relationship. I'm not going to pick sides, and I'm not going to give you homework.
What you're paying for is a space where the truth can exist between you.
That sounds abstract, so let me make it concrete. In most struggling relationships, there are things that can't be said. Not because they're unsayable, but because every time one of you tries to say them, the other person's defences activate and the conversation derails into the same circular argument. The truth gets buried under reactivity.
A hundred pounds buys you fifty minutes where someone is holding that space steady. Where the truth doesn't have to be managed or deflected or turned into a fight. Where the thing that's been sitting between you, unsaid, can finally be said without the room catching fire.
Whether that's worth a hundred pounds depends on what that truth is and what happens when it finally gets spoken. Sometimes it saves the relationship. Sometimes it ends it. Sometimes it does something more complicated than either.
This work asks something real of both of you. It asks you to look at things you've been avoiding - not just about each other, but about yourselves. It asks you to consider that your version of events might be incomplete. That the reaction you're certain is reasonable might be coming from somewhere older than this relationship.
It's not quick. The patterns you've built together took years. They're reinforced by everything you've each brought from your histories, by the particular way your defences interlock with each other's vulnerabilities. Untangling that takes time and patience and a willingness to be uncomfortable.
Some couples come when things first start to feel wrong. Others come after years of the same painful pattern. The earlier you come, the more room there is to work with - the defences haven't had as long to calcify, and there's still enough goodness between you that the difficult conversations feel survivable. But if you've waited, that doesn't disqualify you. It means the work will take longer, and you'll both need to be honest about whether you have the patience and willingness to do it.
Sometimes the work reveals something neither of you expected. Not that the relationship can be fixed, but that it's run its course. That you've grown into different people, or that what you were building together was never going to hold.
That might sound like failure. It isn't.
One of the most valuable things couples therapy can do is help two people separate without destroying each other. Without the children becoming weapons. Without the divorce becoming a war that leaves everyone, including people who didn't choose to be involved, damaged for years.
If you've been together a long time, if there are children, if your lives are woven together in ways that can't be cleanly cut, then how you end matters enormously. The difference between a separation that happens with understanding and one that happens through mutual annihilation is significant. Not just for you, but for everyone around you.
The work requires that both outcomes are possible - staying or separating. That's what makes honesty possible in the room. If the only acceptable outcome is staying together, neither of you is free to say what's actually true.
Something is happening between you that neither of you fully understands. It's driving the arguments, the distance, the loneliness, the resentment. Whether the question you're really asking is about money or about whether things can be different - whether the person lying next to you can become someone you recognise again, whether you can become someone they recognise - the honest answer is: maybe. Depending on what you're both willing to look at.
If you want to understand what's happening, that's where the work begins.